Skip to main content

Healthline, WebMD and a Dream to match magnitude




Yesterday evening, when I was sipping my best cuppa of Coffee...My friends rang me..What time dude..Rememeber we need to meet and discuss..the same..How profitable a business is ehealth...My head was spinning though, I still said Yes...After I came back I thought I should write about Ehealth as a concept and profitability.

For years, thousands of people around the world have been publishing small Websites dedicated to a specific health or mental health topic. Maybe it was a site devoted to colon cancer, or breast cancer, or traumatic brain injuries. Maybe it was a site full of information about depression, or mania, or borderline personality disorder. Thousands of people toiled hundreds of thousand of hours to create these small, informative sites, linking to other great informative sites or which are already successful and all that, but does that works?



In late 1996 and early 1997, companies started forming around the idea of compiling a whole bunch of health or mental health information onto one site, and making money by selling targeted advertising on these mega-sites. It was happening in other industries, such as news, entertainment, and technology, so it made sense to give it a try in the healthcare industry as well. Except that a person's health is probably one of the most important and valuable things we all hold dear. These companies didn't quite get that at the time. But they would.




Before you knew it, venture capitalists were circling around these companies, seeing a profitable business waiting in the wings (since healthcare in the U.S. is nearly a $1 trillion a year industry). Only one company really understood what it would take to grab a significant portion of that pie (Healtheon), while the others thought it could be done through appealing to consumers to come visit their site over that of all those smaller sites or the NIH or NIMH directly. They talked in Internet jargon about "value-add" and an "electronic medical record" (which was later changed into the more nebulous and softer-sonding "personal medical record"). Everyone thought that people like you and I would think nothing of trusting our valuable medical data to these for-profit, commercial companies to store.




And so they arose. Drkoop.com and WebMD were actually somewhat late players to the game, but each found a way to wiggle their way into an already-crowded e-health marketplace. Drkoop.com through its brand name recognition (although I still get the "Who's that?" when I'm talking to people) and WebMD through a cash-infused acquisitions budget, allowing them to gobble up other key players (such as the popular Sapient Health Network). This was in 1998, and already some people could see the writing on the wall for some of these companies if they didn't have a more sound business strategy than simply pursuing consumers with congegrated health information.






Why the plans are just Good plans sometimes?






Of course they all had plans, business plans, but the problem with these plans is that they were all geared toward what the investors wanted to read and hear. They hired others to help them develop a coherent strategy, but didn't listen closely to everything those consultants had to tell them. Most of these companies had little or no healthcare experience.(I still don't know why people dont look for Doctors with ehealth exposure, They just end up hiring IT guys or online marketing people..)






This is the mistake that most ehealth enterpreneurs make, Having your own dedicated staff is essential and then even major tasks you will simply pull off.If You see Drkoop.com morphed from an electronic medical record software company into a consumer healthcare portal. That's a heck of a transition to undertake, and a difficult one to pull off successfully. Yet with proper staff, team lead and Ehealth specialist, they managed to do that.






Consequence:Success!






Also many people ,from my friends list were interested in knowing about the success of WebMD.Well, WebMD played it smart and bought an entire company that specializes in medical and health information just to get unfettered and exclusive access to its content library. WebMD finally realized that in order to survive as a company, they needed a more comprehensive strategy than just repositioning health information and selling advertising. So they found a partner and a match in Healtheon, who acquired WebMD in 1999. The companies also struck partnerships with other content providers to flesh out components of their Website.






Similarly, Drkoop.com created a clinical trials area after partnering with a clinical trials company. Of course, this presents new types of problems when that area offers only trials from that one company's database. That means consumers visiting that area will never see the vast majority of clinical trials they could sign up for.






Here there market research was lacking, Presence of mind is a big factor in internet setups.When Drkroop was doing all this, for consumers, the NIH already had offered an open, comprehensive clinical trials database. And, oops!, drkoop.com forgot to let consumers know that they were getting paid for each successful clinical trial referral. (In fairness, drkoop.com stopped this practice shortly after it was brought to light in a negative press article in the NY Times, and now offer a more open, but clearly not very comprehensive, clinical trials database. They still do not help consumers find information that drkoop.com doesn't have by providing a link to the much larger NIH database, though.)






The latter is not a good practice though! One should think about visitors convenience above all.



Healthcare Today has taken a shift from Facility centric healthcare model to consumer centric one..









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Healthcare On Mobiles: Featured post- mHealth fighting malnutrition

Healthcare On Mobiles: Featured post- mHealth fighting malnutrition
Malnutrition is a byword in the forested hills of the Melghat region inhabited mostly by Korku Adivasis. Every year 400-500 children between the ages of 0 and 6 die in the region, comprising Chikhaldhara and Dharni taluks, according to official figures from 2005.


The Problem: Thousands of kids die every year in the tribal area of Melghat (Maharashtra, India) due to lack of medical attention and nutritional support. Increased incidence and rapid spread of infectious diseases such as pneumonia, typhoid, and dysentery are primary cause of high child mortality. Situation worsens during monsoon when the food supplies are low and the communicable diseases are at their peak.

Melghat is also a place known for high infant mortality rate. Some reasons for the health crisis in Melghat include lack of infrastructure, under-equipped and under-staffed public health and ICDS centres, the tradition of early marriages and early mothe…

The Formula of Driver and Demand- Indian Startups story

The healthcare industry is currently experiencing change at an unprecedented rate. Change is not only occurring in the technology used in diagnostics and care delivery, but this change is so fundamental that it could, and likely will, fundamentally alter the business model of the industry.
Today we have fitness bands, healthcare apps, appointment schedulers, health chats and several such means to access healthcare but one thing that all of this does not necessarily correlate with high quality of care or better outcomes. We need to understand that “Not even a Ferrari will get us to our destination without a driver.”Formula of Driver:
Driver = (Need + Incentive) where;
Incentive = (Value + Reward) Need = (Gap + Demand)
To define the best drivers, we need to first address the need. Need might not make economic or business sense but it is the best opportunity to leave an impact. No one remembers how much business a “Mughal-e-Azam” or “Usual suspects” did but everyone remembers that these were…

Why we never noticed ZIKA?- Indian Research and Development

“Zika had 'disappeared' because it wasn’t worth worrying about and people weren’t paying attention.”

Zika virus was first identified in 1947 in a sentinel monkey that was being used to monitor for the presence of yellow fever virus in the Zika Forest of Uganda. At this time cell lines were not available for studying viruses, so serum from the febrile monkey was inoculated intra-cerebrally into mice. All the mice became sick, and the virus isolated from their brains was called Zika virus. The same virus was subsequently isolated from Aedes africanus mosquitoes in the Zika forest.

In 1950, when some serological studies were being done, it was found that we humans developed antibodies against this virus. Further studies revealed evidence of infection in other African countries, including Uganda, Tanzania, Egypt, Central African Republic, Sierra Leone, and Gabon, as well as Asia (India, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia). The virus circulating in Brazil is an Asi…